Philosophy has been called the study of ideas, but to anyone who has ever studied it, this is an inaccurate description of what it is – it is the study of constructing and supporting arguments. Very little, if any, credit will be given to students’ ability to repeat definitions or to regurgitate the ideas of historical philosophers in online tests. Rather, they should critically consider ideas, compare ideas, assess flaws in reasoning, and logically support their own ideas. That’s why argument writing is one of the skills that has gained significant importance in online philosophy evaluations.
In any of the fields of philosophy addressed (ethics, political philosophy, metaphysics, or epistemology), the student must present ideas logically and convincingly. This is only heightened by the online format since teachers must evaluate critical thinking and not rote-learning. Students will be better equipped to prepare for clear argument writing and will be more confident when composing philosophy exams if they understand why the writing of an argument is important.
Philosophy Is About Reasoning, Not Memorization
The greatest fallacy of philosophy is that success is dependent on remembering the theories and philosophers. Background knowledge is important, but online exams are not so focused on background knowledge; they focus more on the application of ideas.
Exam questions are rarely ones that ask for the opinion of a philosopher, but rather ask students to assess whether a given argument is convincing or whether a competing argument is more convincing, or to argue whether a given position is correct or not, using logic.
When students are not feeling the pressure, they may resort to shortcuts like “Pay someone to take my exam” in their search for answers in this challenge, like hiring someone to take their exam. However, philosophy assessment has been specifically structured to assess students’ individual reasoning, and the best thing students can learn is critical thinking.
All claims must be backed up by a logical argument
A clear claim is the starting point to strong philosophy writing, but it’s not the finish point. All statements need to be backed up by evidence, reasoning, or examples that tell why the conclusion is justified.
In philosophy, students are expected to present the methods of their own point of view, as opposed to opinion-based writing. Statements that aren’t supported are less likely to get a high grade, as this doesn’t provide any evidence for the conclusion.
The argument is well developed, leading the reader through each of the steps in the thinking process, so that it is easily followed and understood both for the position and the reasons given.
Clarify structure to build persuasive writing
Even the best ideas are not going to have a lot of impact if they’re not well organized. The answers to questions in the Philosophy exam should be structured: Introduction to the question, statement of a position, development of argument(s), consideration of other perspectives, and conclusion, with a justification.
This is an organisation that will enable readers to keep track of the discussion without getting confused. The paragraphs should all support the main idea and not introduce new ideas.
An unambiguous structure also helps students to plan their time more effectively while taking an online exam, which decreases the chances of them answering questions in an incomplete and/or repetitive manner.
Counterarguments Are Part of Strong Thinking
An important point in the philosophy approach to subjects is that they have to consider conflicting opinions. Pupils should not only support their own arguments, but also explain why these other points might be less relevant.
It’s important to recognize other points of view; it shows that you are thinking critically and being honest. Indicates that the writer has thoughtfully included multiple points of view in the conclusion.
To ignore the opinions of others can lead to a weak argument as they fail to answer important questions, and this can also be seen as being rude and disrespectful.
Online Exams Reward Independent Analysis
More and more, there is a focus on original ideas in digital philosophy assessments, not just on repeating what is found in the books. The instructors are interested in whether the students can: analyze unfamiliar scenarios; evaluate evidence; apply philosophical concepts on their own.
The expectation is the reason why some students are looking to pay someone to take my proctored math exam, and looking for help with their proctored math tests, also looking for help with paying someone to take my proctored exam (BAW, 2022).
While this is more of a comment on another discipline, it is indicative of the general stress students would have on the day of their exams when they are tested remotely. In the case of philosophy exams, however, the focus is still on the demonstration of genuine thinking and clear writing analysis.
Common Mistakes That Weaken Philosophy Responses
Many students receive fewer marks than they could if their ideas were correct, as the ideas aren’t presented clearly. Some answers contain very long extracts from philosophical theories, but do not explain how it relates to the question.
Some conclude without adequate evidence or move from one thought to another without the development of logical relationships.
The best answers continue to be directed towards the question asked, but include all paragraphs that relate to the central argument.
Preparing for Better Argument Writing
There is more to enhancing the writing style of philosophy than reading books. Students need to frequently practice analyzing questions, outlining arguments, identifying assumptions, and assessing the counterarguments before completing responses to questions.
The Philosophical Quarterly (2021) states that good philosophy teaching needs to focus on analysis of arguments, logical reasoning, and the capacity to form sound arguments, not just on the recalling of philosophical content.
Conclusion
The online examinations in philosophy are not only intended to test the knowledge of the subject but also to test the skills of the candidates. They assess a student’s critical thinking, logical organization of ideas, and defense of conclusions. Students will engage in well-supported communication through well-constructed arguments and thoughtful analysis. They not only boost examination marks, but also enhance their analytical, communication, and decision-making skills, which are transferable to the workplace.
About The Author
